Workday’s Hiring Tech Faces Discrimination Lawsuit
Tech firm Workday is embroiled in a collective action lawsuit alleging its job applicant screening technology discriminates against individuals over 40, following a California district judge's preliminary order. This case could set a precedent for the use of algorithms and AI in hiring decisions.
The Allegations
- Derek Mobley, along with four other plaintiffs, claims Workday’s algorithms caused him to be rejected from over 100 jobs due to his age, race, and disabilities.
- Plaintiffs allege hundreds of job applications were rejected, sometimes within minutes, blaming Workday’s algorithm for disproportionately disqualifying individuals over 40.
The Broader Implications
- AI hiring tools are increasingly used to manage applications, but experts warn they can exacerbate discrimination based on age, gender, or race.
- A 2018 case saw Amazon scrap an automated ranking tool for favoring male applicants.
Workday’s Response
Workday denies the claims, stating the order is based on allegations, not evidence, and believes the case lacks merit.
The Technology in Question
- Workday’s HiredScore AI claims to use "responsible AI" to grade candidates, but plaintiffs argue it reinforces existing biases.
- Algorithmic decision-making can inadvertently favor certain demographics if trained on biased data, as seen in cases where "baseball" was favored over "softball" in resumes.
What’s Next?
The lawsuit seeks monetary damages and a court order for Workday to change its practices, with the potential for more claimants to join.
Comments
Join Our Community
Sign up to share your thoughts, engage with others, and become part of our growing community.
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts and start the conversation!